Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
80/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Homo sapiens bulk RNA-seq with moderate quality and elevated PCR amplification. Q30 bases (84.2%, measured) fall below the 85–90% threshold, and elevated duplication (35.29%, measured) suggests low input RNA or over-cycling. Usable for expression in well-covered genes; risk of noise in low-abundance transcripts.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0