SRX8136475

ENA first seen 2022

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

61/100 · D

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Homo sapiens long-read PacBio WGS with severely insufficient depth for assembly. Mean coverage (6.1x, extrapolated) falls far below the 30–50x minimum; despite outstanding individual read quality (Q30 97.5%, measured), coverage deficit is fatal to assembly goals. Only suitable for structural variant detection. Evidence strength 0.61 is provisional.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

Sequel II

Platform

PACBIO_SMRT

Read type

long-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 18926280617 reported

total reads 1389265 reported

mean coverage 6.1 extrapolated

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 98.9 measured

pct q30 bases 97.5 measured

gc content pct 40.2 measured

mean read length 13617.5 measured

mean base quality 82.6 measured

adapter content pct 0.02 measured

duplication rate pct 1.19 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 61/100

The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 6.1 extrapolated ×1.2 0%

pct q30 bases 97.5 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 1.19 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0.02 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 22 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0