Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
61/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
PacBio Sequel II long-read WGS of Homo sapiens. Grade D (61/100); provisional—coverage is only 7x (extrapolated, scored 0/100, weight 1.2, the limiting factor) and evidence_strength 0.61. Outstanding per-read accuracy (Q30 97.3%, mean quality 81.5) is wasted; too shallow for diploid assembly—consider only for targeted haplotype or structural-variant validation.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0