SRX8136477

ENA first seen 2022

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

61/100 · D

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

PacBio long-read WGS data (Homo sapiens), grade D driven by 6.4x mean extrapolated coverage, insufficient for human genome analysis. Despite excellent base quality (Q30 97.6%, mean Q82.9) and perfect trimming (zero adapters), coverage undershoot is the binding constraint. Reuse not recommended without additional sequencing.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

Sequel II

Platform

PACBIO_SMRT

Read type

long-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 19844039879 reported

total reads 1373517 reported

mean coverage 6.4 extrapolated

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 98.9 measured

pct q30 bases 97.6 measured

gc content pct 40 measured

mean read length 14416.1 measured

mean base quality 82.9 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 0.06 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 61/100

The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 6.4 extrapolated ×1.2 0%

pct q30 bases 97.6 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 0.06 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 11 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0