SRX8137021

ENA first seen 2022

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

61/100 · D

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Long-read WGS, human. Grade D; extrapolated coverage (6.5×, scored 0/100) is critically insufficient—human WGS requires 30×+ typically. Despite excellent measured base quality (Q30=97.2%, mean=81.2), coverage depth is disqualifying; unsuitable for variant discovery.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

Sequel II

Platform

PACBIO_SMRT

Read type

long-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 20196752997 reported

total reads 1275503 reported

mean coverage 6.5 extrapolated

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 98.7 measured

pct q30 bases 97.2 measured

gc content pct 40.3 measured

mean read length 15828.4 measured

mean base quality 81.2 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 0.91 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 61/100

The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 6.5 extrapolated ×1.2 0%

pct q30 bases 97.2 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 0.91 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 27 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0