Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Ion Torrent Proton amplicon dataset from Homo sapiens contains ~358 million reads generating ~66.8 Gb of sequence for targeted studies, but with substantially lower base quality (82.7% Q20, 3% Q30) typical of Ion Torrent chemistry limitations. The large volume supports high-throughput targeted genotyping despite quality limitations. Researchers seeking Ion Torrent amplicon data will find this relevant.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0