Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Ion Torrent Proton amplicon dataset from Homo sapiens contains ~343 million reads generating ~65 Gb of sequence, suitable for targeted variant discovery in amplicon-enriched genomic regions. The lower base-quality scores (83.7% Q20, 3.1% Q30) are typical of Ion Torrent chemistry and may require higher-coverage targets for variant confirmation. Researchers searching for amplicon sequencing or targeted genotyping will find this relevant for high-throughput mutation screening.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0