SRX858057

ENA first seen 2015

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

73/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Short-read WGS with borderline coverage (~15×). Mean coverage of 14.9× (scored 31/100, extrapolated) barely supports variant discovery; base quality is strong (Q30=91.4%, duplication 2.49%). Provisional reading with evidence_strength=0.61.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 46199171338 reported

total reads 228708769 reported

mean coverage 14.9 extrapolated

n content pct 0.016 measured

pct q20 bases 95.2 measured

pct q30 bases 91.4 measured

gc content pct 49.2 measured

mean read length 101 measured

mean base quality 35.6 measured

adapter content pct 0.27 measured

duplication rate pct 2.49 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 73/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 14.9 extrapolated ×1.2 31%

pct q30 bases 91.4 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 2.49 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0.27 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 10 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0