Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
89/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bothrioplana semperi bulk-RNA-seq achieves grade B (89/100) with high-quality base composition (96.5% Q30) but is compromised by high read duplication (51.46%, scoring 52/100) and elevated adapter contamination (4.92%, scoring 84/100), likely indicating PCR-driven amplification or library preparation issues. Consider this dataset suitable mainly for coarse-grained analyses; transcript abundance estimates may be biased.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0