Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
83/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Microdalyellia schmidti bulk-RNA-seq achieves grade B (83/100) with pristine base composition (97% Q30, 37.3 mean quality), but catastrophic duplication (86.16%, scoring 0/100) severely limits utility—likely from low-abundance or narrow-complexity input. Expression estimates will be heavily skewed; consider as discovery-phase data only, requiring independent validation.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0