Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
93/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Illumina HiSeq 2000 bulk RNA-seq of Stenostomum sthenum (microscopic worm) produces ~60 million reads (~12.3 Gb) with moderate quality (93.2% Q20, 86.9% Q30), enabling transcriptomic profiling of developmental stages. The dataset supports developmental biology research. Researchers seeking developmental genomics or microscopic-organism transcriptomics will find this useful.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0