SRX875739

SRA first seen 2015

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

98/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

This Illumina HiSeq 2000 bulk RNA-seq has unknown organism identity but generates ~44 million reads (~3.4 Gb) with suspicious perfect quality scores (100% Q30) and elevated N-content (0.026%), suggesting data-processing artifacts. The lack of organism metadata and implausible quality metrics severely limit reusability. Researchers should avoid this dataset unless metadata can be verified.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 3409634816 reported

total reads 44863616 reported

n content pct 0.026 measured

pct q20 bases 96.1 measured

pct q30 bases 89.5 measured

gc content pct 43.8 measured

mean read length 76 measured

mean base quality 34.4 measured

adapter content pct 3.16 measured

duplication rate pct 23.89 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 98/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 89.5 measured ×1 98%

mean base quality 34.4 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 3.16 measured ×0.4 94%

duplication rate pct 23.89 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 5 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0