Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
74/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This Illumina HiSeq 2000 bulk RNA-seq has unknown organism source but contains ~23 million reads (~4.7 Gb) with unusual data characteristics—perfect Q scores (100% Q20/Q30) and elevated N content (0.387%)—suggesting possible sequencing or quality-filtering artifacts. The lack of organism metadata severely limits reusability and raises questions about data authenticity. Researchers should approach this dataset with caution and verify metadata before reuse.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0