Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
88/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Short-read amplicon-targeted RNA-seq (Rhabdopleura, HiSeq 2500); grade-B, passed by modest Q30 (86%) and mean base quality (34.2), but measured adapter contamination (4.53%) and moderate duplication (33.39%) edge the score down; appropriate for exploratory transcriptomics with sequence-specific validation.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0