Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
65/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Long-read WGS (human, PacBio Sequel II); grade-D (score=65/100) with identical coverage limitation (9.9×, extrapolated, scored 9/100) as SRX8948932. Measured metrics are similarly exceptional (Q30=98.1%, base quality=85%). Throughput, not sequencing quality, constrains reuse; provisional read pending measured depth validation.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0