Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
88/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Caenorhabditis elegans bulk-RNA-seq scored B (88/100) with strong base quality (96.4% Q30) and perfect adapter control, but severe read duplication (62.6%, scoring only 28/100) is a red flag—possibly due to low-complexity input or amplification bias. The unusually short read length (31.3 nt) compounds this, limiting mappability and transcript isoform resolution; use with caution for quantification.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0