Experiments
Searchable full-text extractions: founding hypothesis, core claims, experimental setups, key results and statistics — pulled out of each paper as structure. Search a cell line, an assay or an entity (e.g. HUH7) and find every paper that worked with it. This corpus stands on its own: most entries carry no reproduction assessment (yet).
-
Full-text index only
Analysis of protein sequence and interaction data for candidate disease gene prediction.
PMID 17020920 · PMC1636487 · Nucleic acids research · 2006 · 8 claims · 7 setups
Combining CPS and CMP using known disease genes as input achieves sensitivity 0.52 and specificity 0.97, reducing candidate lists 13-fold
-
Has reproduction · 100
Gene signature discovery and systematic validation across diverse clinical cohorts for TB prognosis and response to treatment.
PMID 37471455 · PMC10393163 · PLoS computational biology · 2023 · 8 claims · 8 setups
A network-based meta-analysis across studies identifies a common 45-gene signature specific to active TB disease that accounts for cohort/population heterogeneity
-
Full-text index only
Decision forest analysis of 61 single nucleotide polymorphisms in a case-control study of esophageal cancer; a novel method.
PMID 16026601 · PMC1637030 · BMC bioinformatics · 2005 · 8 claims · 2 setups
DF-SNPs, a novel adaptation of the Decision Forest method, can classify esophageal cancer cases vs. controls based on SNP genotype data with high concordance, sensitivity, and specificity.
-
Full-text index only
Shotgun proteomics and biomarker discovery.
PMID 12364816 · PMC3851423 · Disease markers · 2002 · 8 claims · 7 setups
Shotgun (LC/LC-MS/MS, e.g. MudPIT) proteomic approaches show advantages over gel-based techniques in speed, sensitivity, scope of analysis, and dynamic range.
-
Full-text index only
Size matters: just how big is BIG?: Quantifying realistic sample size requirements for human genome epidemiology.
PMID 18676414 · PMC2639365 · International journal of epidemiology · 2009 · 7 claims · 2 setups
Conventional power calculations for case-control studies disregard analytic complexity (e.g. clinical assessment errors, unmeasured aetiological determinants) and can seriously underestimate true sample size requirements