Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← New search

Metabolite-Centric Reporter Pathway and Tripartite Network Analysis of Arabidopsis Under Cold Stress.

Front Bioeng Biotechnol · 2018
L1 83/100 3/4
Why this verdict

The main results reproduced: recomputed values matched the published ones within tolerance.

Reproduced on the brainbox compute brainarbeit.com
Scoring basis — itemised

Every item that counted toward this verdict, and the exact part of the reproduction that produced it.

Supporting (toward a concern)
Content-critical question only partially held
+2 pts
From: Q5 · Derivability / plausibility 🟡
Content-critical question only partially held
+2 pts
From: Q7 · Core claim 🟡
Content-critical question only partially held
+2 pts
From: Q8 · Severity of the miss (overall human judgment) 🟡
Minor / cosmetic deviation
+1 pts
From: Q3 · Location of the main deviation 🟡
Minor / cosmetic deviation
+1 pts
From: Q6 · Severity of the deviation 🟡
Concordant (toward reproduced)
Code + data deposited & functional
-2 pts
From: Data & code availability Available & functional
Total score +6
✓ What held up
  • Same input data as the authors
  • Reported values were directly comparable
What did not (or only partly)
  • 🟡A deviation arose in the data or preprocessing
  • 🔴A deviation was attributed to the published material
  • 🟡Reported values were not (fully) derivable from the shared data
  • 🟡The deviation was non-trivial in magnitude
  • 🟡The central claim did not (fully) hold under reproduction
  • 🟡Overall, the reproduction showed a material discrepancy
How its reproducibility compares
83/100
Reproducibility score
0.5 SD above mean
vs. all fields · 1173 studies
🎯 Scores higher than 61% of all assessed papers rank 430 of 1173 scored

A 0–100 reproducibility-quality score from the per-question grades, shown as a z-score: standard deviations above (+) or below (−) the mean of comparable assessments.

Reproduction agent’s raw note

Described well enough for the SHIPPED artifact: the repo (gcalab/files @1773274) ships only the 4 Cytoscape .cys tripartite networks (no analysis code). Reproduced Table 3 topology by parsing those networks on «our HPC» and recomputing metrics with a pure-stdlib analyzer. Result is essentially 1:1 for 5 of 7 metrics across all 4 timepoints: nodes, edges, density, diameter EXACT; avg path length EXACT to 3 decimals; clustering coeff matches to 2 decimals under the documented Cytoscape NetworkAnalyzer (degree>=2) convention. 25/28 cell agreements (16 exact + 9 within-tol), 3 mismatch. The mismatches are the 'average # neighbors' row, whose printed values (5.1/4.3/3.9/3.7) are identical to the avg-path-length row; the true 2E/N is 5.0/5.2/7.8/8.8 -> flagged as a likely Table-3 transcription error (low severity). NOT attempted (hard 20%): Table 1 reporter metabolites (64/68/71/102) and Table 2 reporter pathways (79/79/103/94) -- these need the unshipped MATLAB DE step on GSE5620/GSE5621, AraCyc v14 GPR mapping, and the Patil-Nielsen reporter algorithm; no code shipped and AraCyc v14 not pinned (no_code for that sub-result).

💻 Code ↗ 🗄 Data: GSE5620

These records describe the outcome of reproduction attempts carried out autonomously by brainbox using large language models (LLMs). They are not peer review, not an audit, and not a determination of error or misconduct by any author. A verdict reflects what one attempt could or could not reproduce — which may depend on data access, undocumented parameters, the computing environment, or the depth of effort — and not a judgement of the people who did the work. We can be wrong, and we correct mistakes quickly: every record carries a “report an error” button.

Assessment versions

Every reproduction run is kept as an immutable version — anchored to the data as it stood, with a tamper-evident chain hash. A rerun (e.g. after an author updates a deposit) adds a new version; the previous one stays on record.

  1. v1 current initial assessment Score 83
    assessed: 2026-06-14 ⛓ 512884339985
✎ I am an author of this paper

Updated or fixed a deposit, or is there an erratum? Ask us to re-run the metrics. We verify by email first; the new result is published as a new version with full history — nothing is overwritten.

Reason for the rerun

We email you a confirmation link first. The rerun is an objective re-measurement — it cannot change the verdict in your favour, only ask us to look again.

Provenance — full disclosure

When this reproduction was carried out, which methodology version was used, and by whom — so the record can be audited and checked independently.

Reproduced
2026-06-14
Rubric version
v1.0
Assessed by
🤖 AI curator · claude (ai-curator room) · v1.0 · run #1 2026-06-15
no human curator yet
Last updated
2026-08-05

Provisional, curator- or AI-assessed, and independently checkable. A reproduction outcome states what one attempt could reproduce — not a judgement of the authors.

Deep full-text extraction

Model: opus
Founding hypothesis

Can cold stress effects on Arabidopsis metabolic pathways be inferred at the system level directly from transcriptome data using a metabolite-centric reporter pathway analysis, without relying on metabolome measurements?

Core claims
  • A metabolite-centric reporter pathway analysis (RPAm) can infer cold-stress-associated metabolites and pathways in Arabidopsis directly from transcriptome data without metabolome data method
  • Cold stress first triggers mobilization of energy from glycolysis and ethanol degradation to enhance TCA cycle activity via acetyl-CoA mechanism
  • Tripartite gene-metabolite-pathway networks of the cold response lack power law behavior and scale-free connectivity, instead favoring modularity finding
  • Cold stress response involves rewiring of energetics, signal, carbon and redox metabolisms and membrane remodeling finding
  • Reporter metabolites and reporter pathways span amino acid, carbohydrate, lipid, hormone, energy, photosynthesis, and signaling pathways finding
  • Unlike RPAm, GSE analysis did not capture the TCA cycle at any time point, a known cold-stress effect finding
  • The tripartite network is an open k=3 partite graph connecting genes-metabolites and metabolites-pathways, decomposable into bipartite projections resource
Experimental setups
Assay System Perturbation Readout Platform
Affymetrix ATH1 microarray transcriptome (re-analysis of public GEO data) Arabidopsis thaliana Wild Type (col-0), whole plants grown on MS-Agar cold stress treatment applied at day 16 (3, 6, 12, 24 h) differential gene expression / P-values of metabolic genes Affymetrix ATH1 array (>22,000 genes); GSE5620 control, GSE5621 cold
Metabolite-centric reporter pathway analysis (RPAm) Arabidopsis genome-scale metabolic network (AraCyc v.14) cold stress (in silico, from transcriptome) reporter metabolite and reporter pathway Z-scores / P-values MATLAB (ttest2), AraCyc/KEGG/WikiPathways/UniProt
Network/clustering and scale-free/modularity analysis tripartite gene-metabolite-pathway networks none degree distribution power-law fit (γ, R2, KS), modularity communities Cytoscape 3.2, ClusterViz/MCODE, R igraph, CompNet
Principal Component Analysis (PCA) Arabidopsis transcriptome (all genes and metabolic gene subset) cold stress (3, 6, 12, 24 h) sample clustering / time-resolved response / outlier detection
Key results
  • 64, 68, 71, and 102 reporter metabolites significantly regulated at 3, 6, 12, and 24 h of cold treatment 64/68/71/102
  • 79, 79, 103, and 94 reporter pathways significantly regulated at 3, 6, 12, and 24 h 79/79/103/94
  • GSE analysis identified fewer pathways (45, 58, 89, 47) and notably missed the TCA cycle at all time points 45/58/89/47
  • Tripartite networks lacked power-law/scale-free connectivity, favoring modularity
  • Cold stress mobilized energy from glycolysis and ethanol degradation to enhance TCA cycle via acetyl-CoA
  • Alpha-D-mannose 6-phosphate was the top reporter metabolite at 3 h P=0.00163
  • Metabolic gene set of 4,730 genes extracted from AraCyc used for analysis 4,730 genes
Key statistics
  • correlation over 0.95 (data correlation of biological replicates for cold stress experiment (Kilian et al.))
  • count 64, 68, 71, 102 (reporter metabolites at 3, 6, 12, 24 h (P ≤ 0.05))
  • count 79, 79, 103, 94 (reporter pathways at 3, 6, 12, 24 h (P ≤ 0.05))
  • count 45, 58, 89, 47 (pathways identified by GSE analysis at 3, 6, 12, 24 h)
  • pvalue 0.00163 (Alpha-D-mannose 6-phosphate, top reporter metabolite at 3 h)
  • pvalue P ≤ 0.05 (Z = 1.96) (significance threshold for reporter metabolites/pathways)
  • count 4,730 (metabolic genes in the resultant gene set from AraCyc)
  • count 3,225 reactions, 5,276 enzymes, 2,802 metabolites, 542 pathways (AraCyc model content; 10,000 random sampling rounds used for background)

Statistical methods review

Model: sonnet

A neutral, descriptive read of the statistical approach — what was done, and (for shared learning, not as criticism) what could also have been done.

The paper applies a metabolite-centric reporter pathway analysis (RPAm) to publicly available Arabidopsis microarray data (Affymetrix ATH1, ~22,000 genes) across four cold-stress time points (3, 6, 12, 24 h). Differentially expressed genes were identified via two-sample t-tests in MATLAB; resulting P-values were converted to Z-scores via an inverse normal CDF, averaged across each metabolite's k neighboring genes, and corrected against a background Z-score distribution from 10,000 random permutations to yield reporter metabolites and pathways at P ≤ 0.05. Network topology was evaluated using log-log linear regression, Kolmogorov-Smirnov testing, maximum likelihood estimation, and community-detection algorithms (Fast Greedy Community and Newman-Girvan).

Replicationbiological Sample sizeBiological replicates mentioned with correlation > 0.95; exact n per group and time point not stated in the text GroupsCold-stressed vs. control Arabidopsis thaliana (col-0) at 4 time points (3, 6, 12, 24 h) Pairingunpaired Randomization/blindingnot stated Dispersionnone Exact p-valuesyes Effect sizesno Confidence intervalsno Multiplicity correctionnone stated for gene-level t-tests; permutation-based background correction applied to reporter metabolite and pathway Z-scores
Statistical tests used
Test Applied to n Assumptions
Two-sample Student's t-test (MATLAB ttest2) Differential gene expression between control (GSE5620) and cold-stressed (GSE5621) samples at each time point not stated
Permutation-based background Z-score correction (10,000 iterations) with normal cumulative distribution P-value transformation Reporter metabolite scoring and reporter pathway scoring across all four time points not stated
Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) goodness-of-fit test Assessment of power-law fit to tripartite network degree distributions not stated
Log-log linear regression Estimation of power-law exponent γ and R² for scale-free network behavior not stated
Maximum log likelihood estimation Fitting power-law parameters to network degree distributions not stated
Principal Component Analysis (PCA) Quality control, outlier detection, and verification that metabolic-gene projections matched all-gene projections across time points na
Approaches that could also have been used
  • Differential gene expression across ~22,000 probe sets was assessed using a two-sample t-test without a stated false-discovery-rate correction at the gene level
    Could also: A moderated t-test in limma (R/Bioconductor) with Benjamini-Hochberg FDR correction is a widely used approach for Affymetrix microarray differential expression — The moderated t-test borrows variance information across genes to stabilize estimates in small-n experiments, and FDR correction quantifies the expected proportion of false positives among thousands of simultaneous tests
  • Reporter metabolite and pathway significance was declared at a fixed P ≤ 0.05 threshold after permutation-based background correction, applied across hundreds of metabolites and pathways simultaneously
    Could also: Applying a Benjamini-Hochberg FDR threshold (e.g., q ≤ 0.05) across the full set of reporter metabolite or pathway scores — When hundreds of features are scored in parallel, a FDR-controlled threshold quantifies the expected fraction of false discoveries rather than applying only a per-comparison error rate
  • Each metabolite's Z-score was computed as an unweighted mean of its k neighboring genes' Z-scores
    Could also: A weighted aggregation — for example, weighting by edge confidence, reaction stoichiometry, or gene-metabolite co-expression strength — could also be applied — Weighting can reflect the heterogeneous reliability of gene-metabolite associations in the network and may shift emphasis toward better-supported connections
  • Scale-free network behavior was assessed partly via log-log linear regression of the degree distribution
    Could also: The Clauset–Shalizi–Newman (2009) maximum-likelihood framework with bootstrap KS testing is increasingly recommended as the primary test for power-law assessment (the paper cites this work and uses KS and MLE as supplementary checks) — Ordinary least-squares regression in log-log space distorts error structure and can overestimate fit quality; the ML approach provides unbiased exponent estimates and a formal statistical test of whether a power law is a plausible generative model compared to alternatives such as log-normal or exponential
  • Results across the four time points were visualized and compared via overlaid tripartite networks in CompNet rather than a formal statistical test of time-point differences
    Could also: A repeated-measures or mixed-effects model across the four time points, or permutation-based differential network analysis, could also formally test whether network topology or reporter metabolite scores change significantly over time — A statistical model of temporal change would provide P-values and effect estimates for time-course dynamics rather than relying solely on visual comparison of overlaid networks
  • The study reports only P-values and Z-scores for reporter metabolites and pathways, with no measure of expression magnitude or effect size
    Could also: Reporting log2 fold-change alongside P-values (e.g., a volcano plot) could also convey both the statistical significance and the biological magnitude of each gene's or metabolite's response — Effect size information distinguishes statistically significant but small changes from those with large biological magnitudes, which is especially informative when large n makes even tiny differences statistically significant
Software: MATLAB · Cytoscape 3.2 · R/igraph · CompNet · ClusterViz/MCODE (Cytoscape plugin)

Result convergence & founder nodes

Findings this paper shares with others that ran a comparable experiment. A node’s strength is how many independent papers report it (replication breadth) — not how often it is cited, so a heavily-replicated but under-cited founder still stands out.

Citation network

Where this publication sits in the reproducibility-weighted citation graph — what it is built on, and what is built on it. Citation data from OpenAlex.

Citations
22
Impact: medium
Foundation confidence
None of its references are in our reproducibility record yet — its foundation cannot be assessed.
Topics

No assessed neighbours yet — the network grows as more papers are assessed.

What was reproduced

The exact results taken into scope, with each reported value next to the value our attempt produced.

Reproduction scope — pmid-30258841

Paper: Koç İ, Yuksel I, Caetano-Anollés G. (2018) Metabolite-Centric Reporter Pathway and Tripartite Network Analysis of Arabidopsis Under Cold Stress. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 6:121. DOI 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00121.

Code artifact: https://github.com/gcalab/files (commit 1773274c31576c12894e14cca5ede2c69c363008), folder Front Bioeng Biotechnol/. It ships only 4 Cytoscape session files: 3h_cold.cys, 6h_cold.cys, 12h_cold.cys, 24h_cold.cys. These are the tripartite networks (the result behind Table 3). No analysis code (no MATLAB scripts, no reporter-metabolite implementation) is shipped.

Data: AtGenExpress cold-stress microarrays — control GSE5620 + cold GSE5621 (Affymetrix ATH1), time points 3/6/12/24 h. Reporter-metabolite/pathway pipeline used AraCyc v14 (3,225 reactions, 5,276 enzymes, 2,802 metabolites, 542 pathways).

In scope (attempted) — pipeline-derived, reproducible from the shipped artifact

The 4 .cys files are the published tripartite networks. Re-deriving their graph-topology statistics (Table 3) with a standard graph library (networkx) and comparing to the paper is a valid third-party-tool reproduction of a pipeline-derived result (per BRIEF rule P16). Targets:

Result Source Reproduce by
Table 3 node counts (3h/6h/12h/24h) shipped .cys networks parse XGMML, count nodes
Table 3 edge counts shipped .cys networks parse XGMML, count edges
Table 3 network density derived networkx density
Table 3 avg. # neighbors derived 2E/N
Table 3 avg. clustering coefficient derived networkx average_clustering
Table 3 diameter derived networkx diameter
Table 3 avg. (characteristic) path length derived networkx average_shortest_path_length

Out of scope (NOT attempted) — and why

  • Table 1 (reporter metabolites: 64/68/71/102) and Table 2 (reporter pathways: 79/79/103/94): require the unshipped pipeline — MATLAB ttest2 differential expression on GSE5620/GSE5621, mapping to AraCyc v14 GPR associations, and the Patil–Nielsen / Oliveira reporter-metabolite algorithm with 10,000-round random sampling. None of this code is in the repo, and the exact AraCyc v14 release + gene→metabolite mapping is not pinned. Reproducing the exact integer counts is infeasible from shipped material → no_code for this sub-result. This is the hard ~20%; skipped by design (BRIEF rule 3).
  • DEG counts: not a specific reported number in the paper → no_expected_result.
  • Scale-free fit (γ, R², KS test), MCODE clusters, FGC/NG modularity: derived from the same networks but secondary; γ/R² depend on a specific power-law fitting procedure (not pinned). Not attempted in the 80/20 pass.

Compute

All compute on «our HPC» (SLURM job net30258841), repo cloned + analysed on «infra» «path». Only the small results JSON is pulled to «host».

Figures / tables: Table
nodes_3h/6h/12h/24h
Reported
218/246/306/320
Reproduced
218/246/306/320
exact
edges_3h/6h/12h/24h
Reported
545/640/1192/1404
Reproduced
545/640/1192/1404
exact
density_3h/6h/12h/24h
Reported
0.023/0.021/0.026/0.028
Reproduced
0.023/0.021/0.026/0.028
within tolerance
diameter_3h/6h/12h/24h
Reported
12/9/10/9
Reproduced
12/9/10/9
exact
avg_path_length_3h/6h/12h/24h
Reported
5.109/4.337/3.898/3.696
Reproduced
5.109/4.337/3.898/3.696
exact
avg_clustering_3h/6h/12h/24h
Reported
0.69/0.65/0.75/0.77
Reproduced
0.694/0.648/0.754/0.767 (deg>=2 conv.)
within tolerance
avg_neighbors_3h/6h/12h/24h
Reported
5.1/4.3/3.9/3.7
Reproduced
5.0/5.2/7.8/8.8 (true 2E/N)
did not match

Assessments & scoring basis

Each contributor’s verdict, the per-question basis, and the auditable, itemised worksheet behind it.

🤖 AI curator · claude (ai-curator room) · v1.0 L1 83/100

An automated assessment. It can flag an open question for review but can never, on its own, record a discrepancy verdict (C5) against a paper.

🟢1. Data identity
🟢2. Endpoint comparability
🟡3. Location of the main deviation
🔴4. Cause of the deviation
🟡5. Derivability / plausibility
🟡6. Severity of the deviation
🟡7. Core claim
🟡8. Severity of the miss (overall human judgment)
Scoring basis — itemised

Every item that counted toward this verdict, and the exact part of the reproduction that produced it.

Supporting (toward a concern)
Content-critical question only partially held
+2 pts
From: Q5 · Derivability / plausibility 🟡
Content-critical question only partially held
+2 pts
From: Q7 · Core claim 🟡
Content-critical question only partially held
+2 pts
From: Q8 · Severity of the miss (overall human judgment) 🟡
Minor / cosmetic deviation
+1 pts
From: Q3 · Location of the main deviation 🟡
Minor / cosmetic deviation
+1 pts
From: Q6 · Severity of the deviation 🟡
Concordant (toward reproduced)
Code + data deposited & functional
-2 pts
From: Data & code availability Available & functional
Total score +6

Table 3 tripartite-network topology reproduces 25/28 cells exactly/within-tolerance by recomputing metrics from the authors' shipped Cytoscape .cys networks (nodes, edges, diameter, avg path length exact; density and clustering within-tol under the documented degree>=2 NetworkAnalyzer convention). The 3 mismatches are the 'average # neighbors' row, a benign paper transcription error — its printed values (5.1/4.3/3.9/3.7) are byte-identical to the avg-path-length row, while the true 2E/N is 5.0/5.2/7.8/8.8. This is an authors'-side copy-paste, not fabrication. The headline reporter-metabolite/pathway tables (1-2) were not reproducible (no analysis code shipped, AraCyc v14 unavailable). A solid partial with a concrete, low-severity table error flagged for the human.

🤝
Reproduced automatically — and fairly

Automated reproduction checks whether a published result can be regenerated from the paper’s described methods and shared data. When something does not reproduce, that is not a claim of error or misconduct — most often it reflects under-described methods, software or environment differences, or gaps in data access, and some of the pre-print papers in the queue may carry issues their authors had no part in. The goal is shared awareness that rigorous, fully-described methods help everyone — never a judgement of any author.

Are you an author? We would genuinely like to hear from you — to clarify the record, add data or code, re-run the pipeline after an accession update, and publish your response right next to the assessment. Everything here is open and auditable.

🚩 Report an error in this record

Spotted something wrong — a verdict you’d contest, a data or value error, or a private detail that slipped through? Tell us, with a short justification. Authors and readers are equally welcome to write in; we review every report.

Prefer email, or the form below not working? Contact us at support@doesitreproduce.com.

Reproduction footprint

claude-opus-4-8

Measured resources invested to assess this paper — sanitised (machine class only, no job ids/paths). Compute = HPC accounting (SLURM); tokens = the AI agent's session.

139.6 k
tokens (I/O) · 6.5 M incl. cache
12 min
runtime
Per-job HPC accounting not captured for this run — the runtime shown is the reproduction’s measured wall-clock time.