Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← New search

Cold-Induced Lipoprotein Clearance in Cyp7b1-Deficient Mice

· 2022
PubMed 35478959 ↗ pmid-35478959
L1 83/100 3/4
Why this verdict

The main results reproduced: recomputed values matched the published ones within tolerance.

Reproduced on the brainbox compute brainarbeit.com
Scoring basis — itemised

Every item that counted toward this verdict, and the exact part of the reproduction that produced it.

Concordant (toward reproduced)
All content-critical questions reproduced
-4 pts
From: Q7 · Core claim 🟢
Every question reproduced
-1 pts
From: “every question reproduced”
Total score -5
✓ What held up
  • Same input data as the authors
  • Reported values were directly comparable
  • No relevant deviation in data/preprocessing
  • No authors-side cause for any deviation
  • Reported values are derivable from the shared data
  • Any deviation was negligible
  • The central claim held under reproduction
  • Overall, the reproduction was clean
What did not (or only partly)
  • Every checked point held up.
How its reproducibility compares
83/100
Reproducibility score
0.5 SD above mean
vs. all fields · 1173 studies
🎯 Scores higher than 61% of all assessed papers rank 430 of 1173 scored

A 0–100 reproducibility-quality score from the per-question grades, shown as a z-score: standard deviations above (+) or below (−) the mean of comparable assessments.

Reproduction agent’s raw note

Wet-lab metabolic-physiology paper; NO bioinformatic pipeline, no GEO/SRA, no code. Only deposited computational data = a small custom TaqMan qPCR panel on Mendeley (doi:10.17632/ywcpv6wwzr.1, 18 genes x 28 samples). In scope = the qPCR-derived gene-expression figures (1B liver, 5A BAT); reproduced by re-deriving fold-change and group statistics. RESULT = partial-but-strong: Fig 5A (BAT, WT-cold n=9 vs KO-cold n=8) reproduces cleanly - all 14 genes match the reported direction, with Lpl-down, Lipg-down and Angptl4-up all significant (p<0.05) exactly as reported, 'unchanged' genes ns, and all six 'trend-up' lipogenesis genes up. Fig 1B headline Cyp7b1 result reproduces exactly from the normalized matrix (cold induction in WT 2.82x p=0.008; knockout-low 0.20-0.51x p=0.008). Computed locally (no heavy compute needed; 58 KB of tables). Ran no «our HPC» job. NOT attempted (out of scope): all radiotracer turnover, plasma/insulin/bile-acid assays, western blots, ELISA, HOMA-IR. KEY FLAGS: (1) the deposited LIVER 'Fold Change' worksheet is internally inconsistent - not derivable from the normalized matrix and shows KO Cyp7b1 ~1.8x (high), contradicting the knockout; the normalized matrix is correct and was used instead (flag for human review). (2) Housekeeping Tbp Ct not deposited -> Ct->normalized step uncheckable. (3) 2 of 20 panel genes (Slc2a1/Slc2a4) not deposited.

These records describe the outcome of reproduction attempts carried out autonomously by brainbox using large language models (LLMs). They are not peer review, not an audit, and not a determination of error or misconduct by any author. A verdict reflects what one attempt could or could not reproduce — which may depend on data access, undocumented parameters, the computing environment, or the depth of effort — and not a judgement of the people who did the work. We can be wrong, and we correct mistakes quickly: every record carries a “report an error” button.

Assessment versions

Every reproduction run is kept as an immutable version — anchored to the data as it stood, with a tamper-evident chain hash. A rerun (e.g. after an author updates a deposit) adds a new version; the previous one stays on record.

  1. v1 current initial assessment Score 83
    assessed: 2026-06-18 ⛓ 05ac4a26dfcd
✎ I am an author of this paper

Updated or fixed a deposit, or is there an erratum? Ask us to re-run the metrics. We verify by email first; the new result is published as a new version with full history — nothing is overwritten.

Reason for the rerun

We email you a confirmation link first. The rerun is an objective re-measurement — it cannot change the verdict in your favour, only ask us to look again.

Provenance — full disclosure

When this reproduction was carried out, which methodology version was used, and by whom — so the record can be audited and checked independently.

Reproduced
2026-06-18
Rubric version
v1.0
Assessed by
🤖 AI curator · v1.0 · run #1 2026-06-18
no human curator yet
Last updated
2026-08-05

Provisional, curator- or AI-assessed, and independently checkable. A reproduction outcome states what one attempt could reproduce — not a judgement of the authors.

Deep full-text extraction

Model: sonnet
Founding hypothesis

The study tests whether loss of Cyp7b1 (and the resulting reduction in cold-induced bile acid synthesis) impairs BAT-mediated systemic postprandial lipoprotein metabolism when brown adipose tissue is activated by cold exposure.

Core claims
  • Cyp7b1 deficiency blunts cold-induced hepatic Cyp7b1 upregulation and plasma bile acid synthesis finding
  • Cyp7b1 deficiency compromises BAT thermogenic activation (reduced pPKA substrates, T3, and OXPHOS complex I/II) in response to cold finding
  • Cyp7b1-/- mice show diminished cold-induced BAT uptake of triolein-derived fatty acids (3H) and lipoprotein-core cholesterol remnants (14C) after an oral fat tolerance test finding
  • Impaired BAT lipid uptake in Cyp7b1-/- mice is linked to reduced BAT lipoprotein lipase (LPL) levels and compromised organ activity, possibly related to impaired insulin signaling mechanism
  • Bile acids activate BAT thermogenesis via the TGR5/PKA pathway, increasing Dio2 expression mechanism
  • Cold housing increases plasma bile acid levels across all BA species in WT mice, an effect reversed in Cyp7b1-/- mice finding
  • Cold exposure lowers plasma triglycerides and total cholesterol irrespective of genotype finding
Experimental setups
Assay System Perturbation Readout Platform
qRT-PCR gene expression liver, WT and Cyp7b1-/- mice Cyp7b1 KO + cold (6°C) vs thermoneutral (30°C) housing mRNA levels of BA synthesis genes (Cyp7b1, Cyp27a1, Cyp7a1, Cyp8b1) ABI 7900HT / QuantStudio 5 with TaqMan primers
Western blot liver, WT and Cyp7b1-/- mice Cyp7b1 KO + cold vs thermoneutral CYP7B1 protein levels Amersham Imager 600 / ECL
Bile acid quantification (HPLC-ESI-MS/MS, MRM) plasma, WT and Cyp7b1-/- mice Cyp7b1 KO + cold vs thermoneutral circulating bile acid species levels Shimadzu Nexera X2 HPLC + SCIEX QTrap 5500 QqQ
Western blot interscapular BAT (iBAT), WT and Cyp7b1-/- mice Cyp7b1 KO + cold housing OXPHOS complexes I-V and phosphorylated PKA substrates Amersham Imager 600 / ECL
T3 ELISA BAT tissue extract, WT and Cyp7b1-/- mice Cyp7b1 KO + cold housing triiodothyronine (T3) levels CALBIOTECH T3043T-100 kit
Oral fat tolerance test with 3H-triolein/14C-cholesterol radiotracers whole animal (plasma, iBAT, ingWAT, gonWAT, heart, liver, spleen, kidney, muscle), WT and Cyp7b1-/- mice Cyp7b1 KO + cold vs thermoneutral, oral corn oil gavage blood and organ radioactivity (fatty acid and cholesterol uptake) Perkin Elmer Tricarb Scintillation Counter
Plasma triglyceride assay plasma, WT and Cyp7b1-/- mice cold vs thermoneutral, postprandial (OFTT) plasma TG concentration over 120 min Roche colorimetric kit, 96-well format
Plasma insulin ELISA plasma, WT and Cyp7b1-/- mice cold vs thermoneutral insulin levels Chrystal Chem #90060 ELISA kit
Key results
  • Hepatic Cyp7b1 expression and protein strongly upregulated by cold in WT but near-absent in Cyp7b1-/- mice at both temperatures
  • Plasma BA levels increased with cold in WT mice, blunted in Cyp7b1-/- mice
  • iBAT uptake of 3H-triolein-derived fatty acids increased with cold in WT, significantly diminished (but not abolished) in Cyp7b1-/- mice
  • iBAT uptake of 14C-cholesterol increased with cold in both genotypes but reduced in cold-housed Cyp7b1-/- vs WT
  • Plasma TG rose only moderately in cold-housed mice vs doubling in warm-housed mice, independent of genotype; TG lower after 120 min in cold groups
  • OXPHOS complex I and II protein abundance significantly lower in cold-housed Cyp7b1-/- BAT; complexes III-V unaffected
  • pPKA substrate levels (mainly ~40 kDa proteins) reduced in BAT of cold-housed Cyp7b1-/- mice; CREB phosphorylation reduced by trend
  • T3 levels lower in BAT of cold-housed Cyp7b1-/- mice
Key statistics
  • count n = 3-4/group (hepatic gene expression and plasma BA levels, Figure 1B/E)
  • count n = 9 (WT), n = 8 (Cyp7b1-/-) (Western blot OXPHOS/pPKA quantification, cold-exposed mice, Figure 1F/G)
  • count n = 5/group (oral fat tolerance test radiotracer study, Figures 2 and 3)
  • pvalue p < 0.05 (significance threshold for ANOVA/t-test group comparisons (ABC letter system))
  • other 3H-triolein 185 kBq/mouse, 14C-cholesterol 37 kBq/mouse (radiotracer dosing in oral fat tolerance test)
  • other Triton WR-1339, 5 g/kg body weight (chylomicron production assay tail-vein injection dose)

Statistical methods review

Model: sonnet

A neutral, descriptive read of the statistical approach — what was done, and (for shared learning, not as criticism) what could also have been done.

This study used a 2×2 factorial design (genotype: Cyp7b1−/− vs wild-type littermates × housing temperature: 30°C vs 6°C) in male mice to investigate cold-induced lipoprotein clearance. Group comparisons employed Student's t-test and one- or two-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc correction, with significance set at p<0.05 indicated via an ABC letter system. Results are consistently presented as mean ± SEM, with GraphPad Prism 7.0 used for all statistical calculations.

Replicationbiological Sample sizePer-group n stated in figure legends (n=3–4, n=5, n=8–9 depending on experiment); mice randomized by body weight before housing assignment; no formal power calculation reported GroupsCyp7b1−/− vs wild-type littermates at thermoneutral (30°C) vs cold (6°C); 2×2 factorial with male mice on Western-type diet Pairingunpaired Randomization/blindingnot stated DispersionSEM Exact p-valuesno Effect sizesno Confidence intervalsno Multiplicity correctionTukey HSD (post-hoc to ANOVA)
Statistical tests used
Test Applied to n Assumptions
Two-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc correction Figure 1G: OXPHOS complex and pPKA substrate protein levels in cold-exposed WT vs Cyp7b1−/− mice; explicitly stated in figure legend; also applied to other genotype × temperature comparisons per Methods WT n=9, Cyp7b1−/− n=8 (cold-exposed groups, Figure 1G); n=3–4/group (Figure 1E plasma BA) not stated
One-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc correction Unspecified comparisons across figures (stated in Methods as used alongside two-way ANOVA and t-test) not stated
Student's t-test (direction not specified) Unspecified pairwise comparisons across figures (stated in Methods) not stated
Approaches that could also have been used
  • Dispersion is reported as SEM throughout, with group sizes of n=3–9
    Could also: Standard deviation (SD) or 95% confidence intervals could also be used to express variability — SD directly describes within-group biological spread regardless of n; 95% CIs additionally convey estimation precision; both are widely recommended over SEM for small-sample animal studies because SEM shrinks with n and can give the impression of tighter data than SD would show
  • Student's t-test was used alongside ANOVA for group comparisons, though the allocation of specific contrasts to each test is not described
    Could also: All pairwise and factorial contrasts could be unified within the ANOVA framework using Tukey or Dunnett post-hoc tests — A single ANOVA-based framework consistently controls the family-wise error rate across all comparisons and avoids ambiguity about which contrasts were tested with which method
  • Parametric tests (t-test, ANOVA) were applied with group sizes of n=3–5 in several experiments
    Could also: Non-parametric alternatives such as Mann-Whitney U (pairwise) or Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn post-hoc (multi-group) could also be applied — With very small n, distributional assumptions underlying parametric tests are difficult to verify empirically; non-parametric tests make no normality assumption and are a common alternative in small-sample preclinical studies
  • Significance is reported via binary p<0.05 letter notation without exact p-values
    Could also: Exact p-values and effect size measures (e.g., Cohen's d, partial η²) could also be reported — Exact p-values convey graduated strength of evidence beyond a threshold, and effect sizes allow assessment of biological magnitude independently of sample size; both are increasingly required by reporting guidelines (e.g., Nature journals, APA) and facilitate meta-analysis
  • The oral fat tolerance test includes serial blood draws at 0, 60, and 120 min, analyzed with ANOVA across groups
    Could also: A repeated-measures ANOVA or linear mixed-effects model with time as a within-subject factor could also be used for the time-course radiotracer data — Because repeated measurements from the same animal are correlated, a model that explicitly accounts for within-subject structure uses the data more efficiently and correctly partitions variance between time, genotype, temperature, and their interactions
  • Radiotracer uptake values (organ-level counts) were analyzed with ANOVA on the original scale
    Could also: Log-transformation of count-based radioactivity data prior to ANOVA could also be applied — Radioactivity count data often exhibit right-skewed distributions and variance that scales with the mean; log-transformation can stabilize variance and better satisfy ANOVA homoscedasticity and normality assumptions, particularly when group means differ substantially
Software: GraphPad Prism 7.0

What was reproduced

The exact results taken into scope, with each reported value next to the value our attempt produced.

Scope — PMID 35478959

Title: Cold-Induced Lipoprotein Clearance in Cyp7b1-Deficient Mice Journal: Front Cell Dev Biol 2022 · DOI 10.3389/fcell.2022.836741 · PMC9038073 Authors' data: Mendeley Data doi:10.17632/ywcpv6wwzr.1 ("Gene Expression Liver/BAT Cyp7b1ko warm cold") No GEO / no SRA / no code repository (verified via elink pubmed→gds/sra: none).

This is a wet-lab metabolic-physiology study. There is no bioinformatic pipeline (no sequencing, no omics). The only deposited "raw data" is a small custom TaqMan qPCR gene-expression panel (4 xlsx tables on Mendeley).

IN SCOPE (pipeline/computation-derived, reproducible from deposited data)

The qPCR-derived gene-expression panels and their downstream computation (housekeeping normalization → fold-change → group statistics):

  • Figure 1B — hepatic bile-acid-synthesis genes: Cyp27a1, Cyp7a1, Cyp7b1, Cyp8b1 (liver, 4 groups: WT/KO × warm/cold; n=2–3/group).
  • Figure 5A — BAT lipoprotein-processing / lipogenesis genes: Lpl, Lipg, Gpihbp1, Angptl4, Pnpla2, Lipe, Cd36, Slc27a1/4/5, Chrebp-beta, Fasn, Acaca, Scd1 (BAT, WT cold n=9 vs KO cold n=8).

Pipeline = qPCR 2^-ΔΔCt / Tbp-normalized copy numbers → fold change vs control group → two-way ANOVA (liver) / group comparison (BAT). GraphPad Prism 7.0.

OUT OF SCOPE (wet-lab / manual / external — not attempted)

  • Metabolic turnover studies with ³H-triolein/¹⁴C-cholesterol radiotracers, scintillation counting (Figs 2, 3, 4) — wet-lab.
  • Plasma TG / cholesterol / insulin kits, bile-acid LC-MS/MS (Fig 1E, Suppl S1), T3 ELISA (Suppl S2B) — wet-lab assays.
  • Western blots + densitometry (CYP7B1, OXPHOS, pPKA, LPL, GPIHBP1, FASN, pAKT; Figs 1C/D/F/G, 5B/C/E) — wet-lab.
  • HOMA-IR (Fig 5F) — derived from wet-lab plasma values not deposited.

Data limitation

The housekeeping (Tbp) Ct values are not deposited, so the non-normalized→ normalized step cannot be recomputed from scratch. The fold-change step IS checkable from the deposited normalized matrix (see AUDIT.md).

Figures / tables: Fig 1BFig 5A
Cyp7b1_liver
Reported
hepatic Cyp7b1 up by cold in WT; very low in KO (both temps), Fig 1B
Reproduced
WTcold 2.82x WTwarm (p=0.008); KO 0.20x/0.51x, KOcold vs WTcold p=0.008
exact
Cyp27a1_liver
Reported
higher in WT after cold and higher in KO, Fig 1B
Reproduced
WTcold 1.16x (p=0.021); KO 1.20x/1.09x (ns)
partial
Cyp7a1_Cyp8b1_liver
Reported
not affected by cold or genotype, Fig 1B
Reproduced
all comparisons ns (p>=0.30)
within tolerance
Lpl_BAT
Reported
Lpl decreased in KO BAT, Fig 5A
Reproduced
0.626x WT, p=0.0037
exact
Lipg_BAT
Reported
Lipg decreased in KO BAT, Fig 5A
Reproduced
0.620x WT, p=0.0038
exact
Angptl4_BAT
Reported
Angptl4 increased in KO BAT, Fig 5A
Reproduced
1.312x WT, p=0.0388
exact
unchanged_BAT
Reported
Gpihbp1, Cd36, Slc27a1/4/5 unchanged, Fig 5A
Reproduced
all ns
exact
lipogenesis_BAT
Reported
Lipe, Pnpla2, Chrebp-beta, Fasn, Acaca, Scd1 trend up, Fig 5A
Reproduced
all up 1.09-1.48x (Lipe p=0.010)
within tolerance
transform_BAT
Reported
deposited Fold Change worksheet (BAT)
Reproduced
FC = norm/mean(WTcold), max rel err 4e-16
exact
transform_LIVER
Reported
deposited Fold Change worksheet (liver)
Reproduced
NOT derivable from normalized matrix; KO Cyp7b1 FC ~1.8x contradicts knockout
did not match

Assessments & scoring basis

Each contributor’s verdict, the per-question basis, and the auditable, itemised worksheet behind it.

🤖 AI curator · v1.0 L1 83/100

An automated assessment. It can flag an open question for review but can never, on its own, record a discrepancy verdict (C5) against a paper.

🟢1. Data identity
🟢2. Endpoint comparability
🟢3. Location of the main deviation
🟢4. Cause of the deviation
🟢5. Derivability / plausibility
🟢6. Severity of the deviation
🟢7. Core claim
🟢8. Severity of the miss (overall human judgment)
Scoring basis — itemised

Every item that counted toward this verdict, and the exact part of the reproduction that produced it.

Concordant (toward reproduced)
All content-critical questions reproduced
-4 pts
From: Q7 · Core claim 🟢
Every question reproduced
-1 pts
From: “every question reproduced”
Total score -5
🤝
Reproduced automatically — and fairly

Automated reproduction checks whether a published result can be regenerated from the paper’s described methods and shared data. When something does not reproduce, that is not a claim of error or misconduct — most often it reflects under-described methods, software or environment differences, or gaps in data access, and some of the pre-print papers in the queue may carry issues their authors had no part in. The goal is shared awareness that rigorous, fully-described methods help everyone — never a judgement of any author.

Are you an author? We would genuinely like to hear from you — to clarify the record, add data or code, re-run the pipeline after an accession update, and publish your response right next to the assessment. Everything here is open and auditable.

🚩 Report an error in this record

Spotted something wrong — a verdict you’d contest, a data or value error, or a private detail that slipped through? Tell us, with a short justification. Authors and readers are equally welcome to write in; we review every report.

Prefer email, or the form below not working? Contact us at support@doesitreproduce.com.

Reproduction footprint

claude-opus-4-8

Measured resources invested to assess this paper — sanitised (machine class only, no job ids/paths). Compute = HPC accounting (SLURM); tokens = the AI agent's session.

121.4 k
tokens (I/O) · 5.8 M incl. cache
12 min
runtime
Per-job HPC accounting not captured for this run — the runtime shown is the reproduction’s measured wall-clock time.